Rutberg Personal Injury Law - We Help Injured People and Their Families

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player


We represent people injured or killed through negligence.
We stand on the side of the victim.
We never defend those who cause tragedy.
We handle no other type of case.

The firm guarantees legal services to those in need, rich or poor.
We are paid only when we win for our client.

We are built to win.
The firm's attorneys are passionate professionals,
unified by training, study, ethics and mission.
We deliver favorable settlements to our clients in the majority of cases.
But we are courtroom lawyers, ready for trial, whenever trial is warranted.

We do our job correctly.
We do not waste time when a case should be quickly resolved.
We will not be rushed when a case requires time.

We are not strangers to those we serve.
We are easily reached.
When our clients speak, we listen.
When we speak, our clients listen.

The firm is many people.
But my name stands behind every case.
— Marty Rutberg
$129,500 Falling Accident- Rutberg Personal Injury Law

Fall down Case: No. 1903/93

Venue: Dutchess Supreme, NY
Judge: Judith A. Hillery
Date: 03-24-1999

PLAINTIFF(S)
Attorney: Martin P. Rutberg; McCabe & Mack, L.L.P.; Poughkeepsie, NY

DEFENDANT(S)
Attorney:
Richard Bentzen; Cerussi & Spring; White Plains, NY

Insurer: Self-insured for first $100,000 Traveler’s Insurance Company for excess

Facts: On 5/17/96 at approximately 8:45 PM, Pltf., a 55-year-old antique dealer, was walking to her automobile in Deft.’s parking lot when she stepped into a hole in the pavement. The hole measured about 1.5 feet deep, 1 foot wide, and 1.5 feet long. Pltf. claimed constructive notice. She also argued that the absence of black top in or around the hole, as well as the size of the hole, proved that the condition had been present for an appreciable period of time. Deft. argued that there was no proof of the length of time the condition existed; that the condition could have arisen while Pltf. was in the mall, as evidenced by the fact that Pltf. did not see the hole when she arrived at the mall in daylight. Offer: $25,000; demand: $150,000.

Injury: (Not before the jury - settled for $129,500 after the liability verdict) non displaced fracture of the distal tibia. Eleven months later, due to a weakness in the ligaments, Pltf. sustained a refracturing of the lateral malleolus; there was no surgery.

Verdict Information: Pltf.’s verdict on liability (6/0). The case then settled for $129,500. Jury: 2 male, 4 female. The jury deliberated for 1.5 hours. The trial lasted 5 days. Size of edior array:0

Demonstrative Evidence: Photograph of hole; photograph of mall property.

Rutberg Personal Injury Law - New York