Rutberg Personal Injury Law - We Help Injured People and Their Families

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Super Lawyers
Marty Rutberg
Selection for Super Lawyers is based upon such criteria as verdicts; settlements; experience; honors and awards; position within law firm; bar and/or other professional activity; community service; scholarly lectures and writings; education.

Only five percent of the attorneys in the Upstate New York area are named to the list.

$1,500,000 Medical Malpraction - Rutberg Personal Injury Law

Medical Malpractice - XIII/14-53

Case:
No. 4297/94
Venue: Dutchess Supreme, NY
Date: 04-06-2000

PLAINTIFF(S)
Attorney:
Martin P. Rutberg; Martin P. Rutberg & Associates; Poughkeepsie, NY

DEFENDANT(S)
Attorney:
Anonymous

Insurers: MLMIC for the first $1,000,000 of coverage. HANYS is the excess carrier

Facts: This action, which settled before opening statements, resulted in a settlement with a present value of $1,500,000. Plaintiff, age 43 at the time, had been a serviceman for Sears until he was injured in February 1993. The malpractice, which is the subject of this action, occurred during treatment for those injuries. The medical malpractice case had its genesis in Plaintiff’s slip and fall on ice while working in 1993. Village Park Apartments was the Defendant in that premises liability case. The claims for medical malpractice began as third-party claims in that action, where upon Plaintiff filed such claims directly. The premises claim was settled for $125,000, leaving the malpractice claims only. Memorial Hospital was dismissed on motion unopposed by Plaintiff, following completion of discovery. Plaintiff had offered to release the Hospital pre-motion if Defendant would do likewise on the cross-claim, but Defendant declined and opposed the dismissal motion. Facts Plaintiff underwent an anterior/posterior discectomy and fusion at L3-4 and L4-5 with titanium mesh caging and Moss-Miami segmental instrumentation. A Andrews Spinal Surgery Table was utilized to maintain the patient in the 90/90 position over a period of hours during the 91/2-hour procedure. Plaintiff claimed that he awoke from anaesthesia with severe pain in his left lower leg and foot. Plaintiff’s symptoms over the next 24 hours included loss of dorsiflexion, swelling, tissue hardening, and discoloration. Evidence indicated that pain was unremitting, despite morphine. Plaintiff’s symptoms responded temporarily to ice and steroids with immediate resurgence upon discontinuation of those modalities. X-rays showed good hardware and anatomic positioning. A Doppler study of the left thigh was negative. No diagnosis was made until the third post-operative day, when Defendant requested a neurological consult. The neurologist diagnosed compartment syndrome on visual examination. This diagnosis was confirmed on visual examination by another orthopedist, and Plaintiff underwent an emergency fasciotomy followed by complete debridement of the anterior tibialis. Plaintiff claimed that Defendant caused the compartment syndrome because of improper intraoperative positioning and that he failed to recognize its classic signs and symptoms. Plaintiff contended that Defendant was negligent in failing to take appropriate tests such as a venogram and tissue pressures, and failed to timely obtain appropriate consults. Facts Defendant would have argued that postoperative compartment syndrome is rare, and that its occurrence in the absence of known trauma is atypical, and that therefore, it was not a violation of medical standards to fail to suspect or recognize the condition.

Injury: Left drop foot; surgical scarring over the left lower leg; reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Plaintiff claimed that he is unable to pursue gainful employment, and is dependent upon prescription opiates.

Verdict Information: This action, which settled before opening statements, resulted in a settlement with a present value of $1,500,000. Plaintiff, age 43 at the time, had been a serviceman for Sears until he was injured in February 1993. The malpractice, which is the subject of this action, occurred during treatment for those injuries. The medical malpractice case had its genesis in Plaintiff’s slip and fall on ice while working in 1993 The jury deliberated for.


American Association For Justice
Rutberg Personal Injury Law - New York